https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863569 Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxx | |m Blocks| |177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann@xxxxxxxxx> --- $ rpmlint -i -v * log4c.i686: I: checking log4c.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US syslog -> slog The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. log4c.i686: I: checking-url http://log4c.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10 seconds) log4c.src: I: checking log4c.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US syslog -> slog The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. log4c.src: I: checking-url http://log4c.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10 seconds) log4c.src: I: checking-url http://downloads.sourceforge.net/log4c/log4c-1.2.2.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) log4c.x86_64: I: checking log4c.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US syslog -> slog The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. log4c.x86_64: I: checking-url http://log4c.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10 seconds) log4c-debuginfo.i686: I: checking log4c-debuginfo.i686: I: checking-url http://log4c.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10 seconds) log4c-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/log4c-1.2.2/src/sd/malloc.c The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. log4c-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking log4c-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://log4c.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10 seconds) log4c-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/log4c-1.2.2/src/sd/malloc.c The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. log4c-devel.i686: I: checking log4c-devel.i686: I: checking-url http://log4c.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10 seconds) log4c-devel.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. log4c-devel.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary log4c-config Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. log4c-devel.x86_64: I: checking log4c-devel.x86_64: I: checking-url http://log4c.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10 seconds) log4c-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. log4c-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary log4c-config Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. log4c.spec: I: checking-url http://downloads.sourceforge.net/log4c/log4c-1.2.2.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) 7 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 7 warnings. Adding manual pages or extra documentation is probably not up to you, that's why ignorable. The wrong FSF address should be reported to the upstream developers, but no further action is needed from your side. The %defattr line is obsolete, even for EPEL 5. I assume there will be such a package, in view of BuildRoot, %clean and so on. The summary and description for the -devel package are incorrect. There are no static files at all, and if this would be the case, they would have to go into a -static subpackage anyway. And we have no development documentation in the -devel package. What about the log4c-config script in -devel? Shouldn't this go into the base package? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review