[Bug 858239] Review Request: spec2scl - Convert RPM specfiles to be SCL ready

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858239

--- Comment #2 from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda <bkabrda@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Thanks for taking the review. Just BTW, I'm the only upstream developer, so if
anything seems wrong, you can complain to me :)

- Manpage would certainly make a sense, I will consider adding it in a future
version.
- The settings file is not needed now, true. I'm used to putting these in all
my projects, because I know I'll eventually need them. It may be empty now, but
it is already required by another file (it's useless, I know...), so excluding
it would require to also patch the other file. So I'd rather keep it where it
is. As for the settings.pyo file, that is not empty because all bytecode files
contain at least full path to the origin file.

I hope that this explains everything good.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]