[Bug 854679] Review Request: python-sudsds - A python SOAP client modified for usage with Czech Databox

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854679

Jan Synacek <jsynacek@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?(jskarvad@redhat.c
                   |                            |om)

--- Comment #2 from Jan Synacek <jsynacek@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Specfile:
- use %global instead of %define

- do not use BuildRoot:

- do not use rm -rf %{buildroot} in install section (unless you intend to use
the package for EPEL)

- do not use %defattr (unless you intend to use the package for EPEL)

- also, I believe there is a typo on line 36:
  + rm -f {buildroot}... should probably be rm -f %{buildroot}...

Also, rpmlint complains a lot about incorrect fsf addresses:
python-sudsds.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sudsds/transport/https.py
python-sudsds.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sudsds/bindings/__init__.py
python-sudsds.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sudsds/mx/typer.py

That should probably be reported and corrected by upstream.

Other than that, I don't see any more things that need correction. The package
also does not conflict with 'python-suds' that is already present in Fedora.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]