https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851279 --- Comment #10 from Andy Grimm <agrimm@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #7) > In file httpd-cc.conf, you have /usr/lib64 hardcoded, that's likely not > working on 32 bits. Ah, true; I don't ever use 32-bit, so I had not tested that yet. > I also find weird to have : > ServerRoot "/etc/httpd" > > even if i am likely too cuatious about potential side effects. What's the suggestion here? I used that so that specifying relative paths for modules would work. I'm open to other ideas here. > PidFile /var/run/eucalyptus/httpd.pid > > would be cleaner to use the suffix -cc there too, as this would be more > coherent with the -nc web service. Indeed, this is a bug. > Another potential improvement would be to have a common file that would be > included, and maybe removing a bit the various modules ( so 1) this would > take less memory, start faster and easier to read ). > > For example : > LoadModule userdir_module modules/mod_userdir.so > > seems weird there. setenvif_module is not used in the configuration so could > be dropped, etc, etc. > > Also, since it use mpm_event, maybe the other part of the config file could > be dropped : ( mpm_prefork_module, etc ) so the file is easier to read and > maintain ? I'm actually not yet sure which is our preferred mpm. And as for the other modules, I started with a very minimal list and got frustrated trying to figure out which modules are now required for a functional apache instance, so I added all of those which are enabled by default in Fedora's apache config. I would love to prune that list. Suggestions on a true minimally viable set would be great. And yes, a common file definitely makes sense. I'll work on that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review