https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851279 --- Comment #9 from Andy Grimm <agrimm@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #4) > Review would be surely easier if the source was splitted into smaller > component, but I guess that this would require a rather huge change upstream > :) > > I am also quite surprised by the number of BuildRequires, are we sure they > are all needed ? They are all requirements, but I am removing a number of them which are transitive. > For the license of eucalyptus-axis2-clients, that's GPLv3, not BSD in the > spec ? And if upstream do not ship license, you should ask them to include it Sorry, I missed that you mentioned that package; I was referring to the python subpackages. axis2-clients depends on eucalyptus-cc, which depends on eucalyptus, which contains the license file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review