[Bug 851279] Review Request: eucalyptus - Elastic Utility Computing Architecture

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851279

Michael Scherer <misc@xxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |misc@xxxxxxxx

--- Comment #1 from Michael Scherer <misc@xxxxxxxx> ---
This spec is quite complex.

I noticed a few issues :
- %{_libdir}/eucalyptus/ is unowned

- Source11:      eucalyptus-3.1.0-generated.tgz
there is no comment on where and how this was generated or downloaded from

- the whole stuff like :
%global euca_libvirt      libvirt

do not make the spec very readable, IMHO. It would be easier to inline directly

- some patch do not have a mention of being sent upstream ( 14, 15, 16 among
others ), any reasons ?

- some packages would be installed without license file, like
eucalyptus-axis2-clients or python%{?pybasever}-eucadmin

- by the way, if nothing define %ybasever, what is the use ?

- the various %post are puzzling, why does it reload udev, why does -walrus
restart eucalyptus-cloud.service ?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]