[Bug 849175] Review Request: GAPDoc - GAP documentation tool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849175

--- Comment #4 from pcpa <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Ok. Good to know upstream is aware of the not so clear license
of package (by default should be the same as gap itself), and
in newer versions bundles a GPL copy.

My only remaining clarification question is about if the
doc and/or example subdirectories could be marked %doc?
That would probably affect runtime because the help command
should look at the doc subdir, but probably not the example
subdir. The 3k+1 subdir may also be optional, as it is a
"live example". The package should not require a -doc
subpackage as the disk space of those is minimal.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]