https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825494 --- Comment #6 from pcpa <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks again. I added the suggested patch to the new package. Yesterday I thought it could have been some glitch the issue with permissions, as rpmlint was not saying anything about it, but I usually test builds with plain rpmbuild, and when running fedora-review myself did show the problem. I think I have a slightly newer fedora-review, that also did show what I believe can be ignored: [!]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: cliquer-libs-1.21-3.fc16.x86_64.rpm : /usr/share/doc/cliquer- libs-1.21/example/tetromino.h it is an example in documentation. [!]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses found. Please check the source files for licenses manually. not all source files have a license, and none has a full standard license at start, just something like * Licensed under the GNU GPL, read the file LICENSE for details. but the README file should make it clear the license of the package. New package: Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pcpa/cliquer.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pcpa/cliquer-1.21-4.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review