Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: <ppl-0.9> - <A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael@xxxxxxx 2007-02-10 17:33 EST ------- That refers to your original rpm: > http://www.cs.unipr.it/~cimino/ppl-0.9-1.src.rpm The way CXXFLAGS are passed in from the outside, it doesn't succeed: $ grep CXX ppl.spec CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" ./configure --enable-shared \ > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../src -W -Wall -g -O2 > -MT Bounding_Box .lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/Bounding_Box.Tpo > -c Bounding_Box.cc -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ Bounding_Box.o $ rpm --eval %optflags -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables And concluding from that, the %configure macro (which sets CXXFLAGS, CFLAGS and FFLAGS) will not succeed either, because something overrides CXXFLAGS. I haven't yet looked into it. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review