[Bug 227669] Review Request: <ppl-0.9> - <A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: <ppl-0.9> - <A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions>


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669





------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael@xxxxxxx  2007-02-10 17:33 EST -------
That refers to your original rpm:

> http://www.cs.unipr.it/~cimino/ppl-0.9-1.src.rpm

The way CXXFLAGS are passed in from the outside, it doesn't succeed:

$ grep CXX ppl.spec 
CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" ./configure --enable-shared \

> g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../src -W -Wall -g -O2
> -MT Bounding_Box .lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/Bounding_Box.Tpo
> -c Bounding_Box.cc  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ Bounding_Box.o

$ rpm --eval %optflags  
-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables

And concluding from that, the %configure macro (which sets CXXFLAGS,
CFLAGS and FFLAGS) will not succeed either, because something
overrides CXXFLAGS.

I haven't yet looked into it. ;)


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]