https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842379 Peter Meier <peter.meier@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter.meier@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #10 from Peter Meier <peter.meier@xxxxxxxxxx> --- It would be great if EPEL5 could be targeted as well. The main reason is that this would allow one to run mcollective over the same messaging system that pulp would use. As pulp can be deployed on EL5 it is likely that organizations with EL5 and EL6 systems will deploy qpid as a messaging system in their environment to use all the features of pulp. However such organizations might also be interested to use mcollective and hence it would make sense to reuse the already deployed messaging bus for mcollective as well. Otherwise one would have to deploy a second messaging system within the infrastructure to use both (pulp and mcollective). mcollective is able to use different messaging systems, however pulp can afaik only be used with qpid. So if one decide to use pulp qpid is set as a messaging bus. It would be a pity if the only reason for another messaging bus would be that there are no packages on EL5 for mcollective on qpid. Besides one missing package (which can imho be fixed) I couldn't really read out other reasons why EL5 is not targeted. If there are other reasons could you please share them? Maybe they can be addressed as well - I might be able to contribute some time to fix these. Thanks for reconsidering EL5 support. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review