[Bug 845799] Review Request: rubygem-hashr - Simple Hash extension to make working with nested hashes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845799

--- Comment #2 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
* Use %global instead of %define
  - Unless there is any special need, the %global macro should be used in place
    of %define according to FPG [1]

* Test suite
  - It would be nice to execute a test suite of the gem.

* License
  - According to README.md and MIT-LICENSE files, the license should be MIT

* -doc subpackage
  - Have you considered to move the documentation into -doc subpackage?

* Please use the new RubyGems packaging macros [2]
  - It would be nice to use the macros available for gem packaging.
  - For RHEL, you can use [3] as an example and optionally comment on Bug
788001
    to push these macros into RHEL ;)

* RHEL and older Fedora release conditioning
  - Please consider to use "%if 0%{?el6}%{?fc16}" macros instead of wordy
    "%if 0%{?rhel} == 6 || 0%{?fedora} < 17"

* Exclude gemcache
  - We typically exclude the cached version of gem, such as:
      %exclude %{gem_cache}


I would stop at this point and wait for fixes from your side. Thank you.


[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby#Macros
[3]
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rubygem-hydra.git/tree/rubygem-hydra.spec

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]