https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844769 --- Comment #3 from Andy Grimm <agrimm@xxxxxxxxx> --- It was actually the package naming that was confusing. I got mixed up about which pom was in which package; one would think that the one called "parent" would be the "parent" of the other two. So your deps are correct. Now that I've got that straight, though, my question is about the name choice. The subdirectory in which the pom lives is called "common", and the artifactid in the pom is "jbosscache-common-parent". It would make more sense to me to make the subpackage name match the artifactId. You can do this with: %package -n jbosscache-common-parent The -n prevents the subpackage from being prefixed with the main package name. Feel free to get a second opinion on this from other Java SIG folks, though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review