https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844769 --- Comment #2 from Matt Spaulding <mspaulding06@xxxxxxxxx> --- > [3] I think that jbosscache-support and jbosscache-support-xslt should each > require jbosscache-support-parent, so that things which buildrequire either > of those will work. and jbosscache-support-parent should not require > jbosscache-support, as far as I can tell. (If I've misunderstood, please > clarify the current deps) >From looking at the pom files, it appears that: 1. jbosscache-support is parent of jbosscache-support-xslt 2. jbosscache-support is parent of jbosscache-support-parent 3. jbosscache-support depends on nothing AFAICT, the jbosscache-core package's pom file requires only jbosscache-support-parent, which will in turn pull in jbosscache-support as a dependency. I don't think there is a case where the jbosscache-support package will be a direct BR. Of course, we could do what you mention instead and it would still work. I would just need to update the jbosscache-core package to BR jbosscache-support instead of jbosscache-support-parent. I chose the package requires to reflect what is happening in the pom files. If this is counterintuitive I can change it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review