https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844011 --- Comment #6 from Michael Scherer <misc@xxxxxxxx> --- I am working on the review,but now I have a question. The review process ask me to check : "MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime." then why is there %{_libexecdir}/stickshift/cartridges/abstract/COPYRIGHT in %doc ? IE, if I choose to install the rpm with documentation disabled ( there is a macro in rpm for that, and that's something that could be done for a livecd ), would anything break, or is there some requirement to ship the license as part of the cartdrige ? If that's the case and if that's required for runtime, then it should not be tagged as %doc ( since it could be removed by error ), and if that's really just documentation, why ship it in 2 places ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review