https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842509 --- Comment #8 from Jef Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #7) yes all those deps including the pkgconfig are redundant. Removed in latest version of the spec and srpm which are now uploaded back to the url locations. Guidelines still have ldconfig as needed in post and postun. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Shared_Libraries Some of the deps you mention were added due to my misreading of the current directory ownership policy. I've added the directories into the owned files list instead. You'll see the files section updated for all subpackages as a result of that correction. I re-reviewed the licensing in the package. Only the tests are GPL'd. All the payload files in the binary rpm generated from C code that are explicitly licensed LGPLv2 OR LGPLv3 in the C file boiler plate headers. I've changed the License tag accordingly and added a note. Michael, does that address everything? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review