https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840707 --- Comment #61 from Dan Mashal <dan.mashal@xxxxxxxxx> --- @Michael I do not necessarily agree with creating a devel package for 1 or 2 files. Since thisb package is but a subcomponent of a number of other packages I would prefer keeping them for now and seeing if it causes any issues with yum.. we have to take this 1 package at a time. However rules are rules and I will abide by them which is why I created a spec that generates a devel rpm. In regards to your licensing question "why LGPL and GPLv2" please run "licensecheck -r ." in the root of the pristine source and that will answer your question. In regards to Wolfgang aka raveit's concerns they are valid. He currently manages the unofficial mate fedora 16 and 17 repos so he has valid concerns. However those will be adressed AFTER this pakacage is approved. So this review is currently pending Leigh's input at this point. Thanks, Dan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review