https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832816 --- Comment #7 from jiri vanek <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Thanx for clarifications! imho - In My (Honest) Opinion ... sorry for confusion Three concerns remains: testing - I would recommend to run tests after build, and with grep somehow ensure that they passed. If you do not want to bother with this I will not insists, but it is good protection against pack something what is not working in case that your package will be inherited by someone else in some dark future. >mckoi is packaged as library and not as db, for now i haven't interest to add a launcher script Ah that is an pitty :(( But ok. >> a) The not existence of src and demo package is inttional? (means *1) - imho it is more then worthy >yes Hmm.. Why that? Demo package .. ok.. as yo wish, but source package for java package is extremely useful! Probably the best what you can do is jar all .java in src directory and provide it as src jar with similar version and linking as non src one (maybe you do not need to create separate package and just include in your current rpm. What do you think? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review