https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834070 --- Comment #5 from Darryl L. Pierce <dpierce@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #4) > Great. The current installation Perl procedure was broken, or to be fair, > the current uninstallation procedure was broken as there is no reliable way > to remove a perl module via ExtUtils::Makemaker. > > Will this tarball split be in place for the 0.18 beta? The qpid-perl tarball > isn't available in the 0.18 alpha release > (https://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.18-alpha/). I don't think so. I have a patch set that's pending review still in JIRA, but our 0.18 alpha has already been cut. Since this isn't critical path for 0.18, it'll likely be a part of our 0.20 release. > > This is now noted in the specfile. > > > > > * contact the perl bindings author so that the patch in the upstream ticket > > > QPID-3313 [2] can be applied (see comments in the upstream ticket) > > > > I'll take care of this after the package finishes review. I wouldn't want to > > introduce patches to the process at this point. > > I've already tried to have it committed for qpid 0.14 but the patch author > (who also made the Qpid perl bindings) forgot to check the license checkbox > :( Understood. I'll make it a priority post-review. :) > > > Regards, > > > jpo > > > > > > [1] - https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/qpid/0.16/ > > > [2] - Update example scripts for perl binding. > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3313 > > > > > > New SPEC: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-qpid.spec > > New SRPM: > > http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-qpid-0.16-1.fc17.1.src.rpm > > Blocker: > > * The change from "%{perl_vendorarch}/*" to "%{perl_vendorarch}" is a > blocker > as it makes the perl-qpid package own the perl_vendorarch directory. Derp! Sorry, I didn't realize I'd removed the splat. > > Note: > > * You no longer need to add a defattr line to the %files section > The %files section can be something like: > ------ > %files > %doc LICENSE examples/ > %{perl_vendorarch}/* > %exclude %dir %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/ > ------ > > * any particular reason why the release bump was not 2.fc17? > > /jpo Since we're only modifying the specfile and not the underlying code, I'm only treating these as point releases on the spec. Updated SPEC: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-qpid.spec Updated SRPM: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/perl-qpid-0.16-1.fc17.2.src.rpm Thank you. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review