https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832635 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > - The .desktop file is not handled correct, > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files > > I have read these instructions more. Could you tell me more detailed what's > wrong with it? The .desktop file is not installed. > > - http://evoluspencil.googlecode.com/files/pencil-2.0.tar.gz gives an 404 > > error > > Actually, the upstream developer did not release the whole software source > as a tar file like this. He sent me this SVN link: > http://evoluspencil.googlecode.com/svn/branches/pencil-2.0 > I got sources, change some file/folder locations then build myself (of > course, I notified my changes to him) It's not going to fly...downloading source code, modify it locally, and then use that code is not the way it works. When you are using a scm checkout/snapshot, notes about the details should be mentioned in the spec file and the numbering should reflect it too. I suggest that you try to convince upstream to make a proper release. btw, rpmlint says: [fab@laptop11 noarch]$ rpmlint pencil-2.0-1.fc17.noarch.rpm pencil.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/pencil/content/pencil/templates/ODT/default.ODT/Configurations2/accelerator/current.xml pencil.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/pencil/skin/classic/pencil.css pencil.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/pencil/content/pencil/templates/HTML/default.HTML/Resources/SampleStyle.css pencil.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pencil 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review