https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820115 --- Comment #5 from Ding-Yi Chen <dchen@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #4) > I think those binaries really can't be packaged that way, without some kind > of namespacing (name prefix or whatever). Some of the names are extremely > generic and likely to cause conflicts. Others at least follow some naming > scheme, but there I'm not sure those are useful to package at all, e.g. > tests probably don't make sense to install. Although debian and friend do ppackaged "as-is", after test some of the binaries, I would agree you and remove them from release unless someone asks for them. SPEC: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/leptonica.spec SRPM: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/leptonica-1.68-4.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review