https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830863 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags| |needinfo?(jakub@xxxxxxxxxx) --- Comment #2 from Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@xxxxxxxxxx> --- http://people.redhat.com/jakub/dwz/dwz.spec is old, used .spec from: http://people.redhat.com/jakub/dwz/dwz-0.2-1.fc17.src.rpm dwz.spec:8: W: macro-in-comment %{name} - OK. dwz.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: dwz-0.2.tar.bz2 - Fix: There must be public downloadable URL for it. E: incorrect-fsf-address hashtab.c E: incorrect-fsf-address dwz.c E: incorrect-fsf-address hashtab.h - Fix. W: manual-page-warning dwz.1.gz 83: warning: macro `Nothing' not defined - Fix: -into -.B FILE -\. Nothing is written if +into \fBFILE\fR. Nothing is written if W: manual-page-warning dwz.1.gz 132: warning: macro `If' not defined - Fix: -and in the last file to -.I ../../.dwz/foobar-1.2.debug -\. If e.g. bin/foo.debug and bin/foo2.debug were hardlinked +and in the last file to \fI../../.dwz/foobar-1.2.debug\fR. +If e.g. bin/foo.debug and bin/foo2.debug were hardlinked make in %build - It should use: %{?_smp_mflags} BuildRequires: elfutils-libelf-devel - It should use: %{?_isa} As I expect it will go also for EPEL-5 it will need Buildroot, rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and maybe some other things. Not an issue here. BTW it prints: dwz.c: In function 'write_dso': dwz.c:10172:10: warning: ignoring return value of 'fchown', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review