[Bug 830992] Review Request: libseccomp - Enhanced seccomp library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830992

--- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
This isn't a review, just some comments.

I find spec files much easier to read if the fields
are lined up, like this example:

http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/whenjobs/whenjobs.spec

Modern spec files *don't* need:

* BuildRoot
* %clean
* rm -rf buildroot
* defattr

All of the above can be removed.

Is the license LGPLv2 or LGPLv2+?

Instead of ./configure + options, use %configure macro.

Instead of CFLAGS=..., use 'make %{_smp_mflags}'

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]