https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825854 --- Comment #4 from Jørn Lomax <northlomax@xxxxxxxxx> --- I based the spec file on the zita-resample .spec file, as they are both similar in how they work (and I'm still learning to use .spec files.). As to why the author of that package doesn't want to use ldconfig in the build enviroment is do not know. Should I just replace: > sed -i -e 's|-O2 -Wall|%{optflags} -I../libs|' \ > -e 's|ldconfig||' libs/Makefile > # We don't want to run ldconfig in the build environment. with ldconfig instead ? (In reply to comment #3) > There's an eyebrow-rasier in the spec file: > > > sed -i -e 's|-O2 -Wall|%{optflags} -I../libs|' \ > > -e 's|ldconfig||' libs/Makefile > > # We don't want to run ldconfig in the build environment. > > Why? > And later: > > > # install missing symlink (was giving no-ldconfig-symlink rpmlint errors) > > ln -sf %{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so.%{version} %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so.0 > > Running ldconfig would create that missing symlink. You could even > explicitly run > > ldconfig -n %{buildroot}%{_libdir} > > to create the needed symlink instead of creating it manually with a > hardcoded version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review