https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820544 --- Comment #16 from Simone Caronni <negativo17@xxxxxxxxx> --- I've checked the _isa debate: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines "MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} [21]" - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/DraftsTodo "Use %{_isa} to make hardcoded Requires Arch Specific" Additional info: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ArchSpecificRequires - http://www.rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/ArchDependencies So I assume those are to be kept in the spec file. Thanks, --Simone -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review