https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822896 --- Comment #13 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > Paul, I have been repeatedly reading over the rationale for this > > "Conflicts:", but still fail to understand it. > > > > Could you try to elaborate/summarize it? Which problem is this trying to > > resolve? > > > > Without this "Conflicts:", I would likely have approved these packages ;) > it says that the elldata package requires "PARI/GP 2.2.11 and up", or in > other words, it's not compatible with earlier versions of pari. Understood, but AFAIS, these are mere data packages, right? Do they disturb older releases of pari? > I can't add > a "Requires:" for this version as that would create a circular build > dependency (I want to be able to use this data package in pari's %check), so > the conflict seems to be the best way of expressing this relationship. I think, these data packages should not "require pari" nor should they "conflict:", but be treated as arbitrary and independent data packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review