https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825418 --- Comment #3 from Ricky Elrod <codeblock@xxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for the review! I've updated the spec with your suggestions. Same URLs: Spec URL: http://codeblock.fedorapeople.org/packages/elixir/elixir.spec SRPM URL: http://codeblock.fedorapeople.org/packages/elixir/elixir-0.5.0-1.20120526git6052352.fc18.src.rpm I'm not too worried about EL5 builds, but F16 and EPEL 6 will be nice, when Erlang gets updated there. :) Here's a (successful) rawhide scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4104402 And rpmlint output from the updated spec has not changed: [ricky@t520 rpmbuild]$ rpmlint ./SPECS/elixir.spec ./SPECS/elixir.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: elixir-lang-elixir-v0.5.0-0-g6052352.tar.gz 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [ricky@t520 rpmbuild]$ rpmlint ./RPMS/noarch/elixir-0.5.0-1.20120526git6052352.fc18.noarch.rpm elixir.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iex elixir.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary elixirc elixir.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary elixir 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review