[Bug 825418] Review Request: elixir - A modern approach to programming for the Erlang VM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825418

--- Comment #3 from Ricky Elrod <codeblock@xxxxxxxx> ---
Thanks for the review!

I've updated the spec with your suggestions.

Same URLs:

Spec URL: http://codeblock.fedorapeople.org/packages/elixir/elixir.spec
SRPM URL:
http://codeblock.fedorapeople.org/packages/elixir/elixir-0.5.0-1.20120526git6052352.fc18.src.rpm

I'm not too worried about EL5 builds, but F16 and EPEL 6 will be nice, when
Erlang gets updated there. :)

Here's a (successful) rawhide scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4104402

And rpmlint output from the updated spec has not changed:

[ricky@t520 rpmbuild]$ rpmlint ./SPECS/elixir.spec 
./SPECS/elixir.spec: W: invalid-url Source0:
elixir-lang-elixir-v0.5.0-0-g6052352.tar.gz
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.


[ricky@t520 rpmbuild]$ rpmlint
./RPMS/noarch/elixir-0.5.0-1.20120526git6052352.fc18.noarch.rpm 
elixir.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iex
elixir.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary elixirc
elixir.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary elixir
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]