Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 --- Comment #91 from Tim Niemueller <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-05-15 07:08:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #87) > hi tim, > > unfortunately compatibility for sympy 0.7.1 is not that easy. like promised > i'll be looking into compatibility for it shortly and within the week it should > be in trunk. but keep in mind it will be officially released in openrave 0.8.0. > for now, just package sympy 0.6.x, i'm sure fedora core supports offering rpms > with different versions of libraries as long as they are named differently. > it's not worth breaking openrave functionality. Nope, it ain't that easy and it would mean I need to file another review request. I have already done almost half a dozen for OpenRAVE, so I'd rather wait for sympy 0.7 compatibility. > also, just did a hot fix for openrave 0.6.4 for "openrave-core.pc.in", i highly > suggest you repackage the srpm with r3204 of > > https://openrave.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/openrave/tags/0.6.4 I'll have a look. > as for libfparser, the priority on it is really low. by the time openrave 0.8.0 > releases, most likely fparser will have reached a different version ;0) Well, for now I'm happy with the old fparser version. Let me know when I can upgrade. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review