Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816012 --- Comment #9 from Alec Leamas <leamas.alec@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-05-08 18:11:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > [cut] > > Yes, another goof on my part. It should be the correct GPL 2.0 now. My > apologies for wasting your time. Don't apologize, there is really no need ;) > I still believe this is the correct use. Use of the virtualenv program is > widespread amongst python developers and the use of the word 'virtualenv' to > denote an environment created by the virtualenv program is common. I can't > back > this up and will change it to some other language if you insist. This is not a blocking issue. I still prefer something else directed to those not looking for virtualenv - those who do have already seen it in the name. > > [!] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/python-virtualenv/ states > > the license as "MIT-style permissive license" - that's not GPLv2+. > > Unless I'm mistaken, since python-virtualenvcontext *uses* python-virtualenv > and > not the other way around, and since python-virtualenvcontext has the stronger > license, python-virtualenvcontext is not relegated to bearing the same license > as its dependency python-virtualenv. MIT is GPL-compatible. Indeed, my bad, I got it wrong, missed it is another package... ***Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review