Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815989 Alan Pevec <apevec@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |apevec@xxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Alan Pevec <apevec@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-04-25 17:41:52 EDT --- This is based on existing package: compared to rawhide, only change is parallel installation. => APPROVED MUST OK rpmlint => python-routes1.12.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/python-routes1.12-1.12.3/docs/_build/html/.buildinfo 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. This warning is not critical and appears with rawhide too. OK name OK spec file name = %{name}.spec American English legible locales %find_lang UTF-8 filenames OK Packaging Guidelines OK license Fedora approved spec field in %doc OK sources url => wget http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/R/Routes/Routes-1.12.3.tar.gz md5sum => echo "9740ff424ff6b841632c784a38fb2be3 Routes-1.12.3.tar.gz" | md5sum -c Routes-1.12.3.tar.gz: OK OK BuildRequires OK directories own all or require a package no directory conflicts OK no dups in %files (exception: license texts) OK Permissions OK consistently use macros OK code or permissable content SHOULD OK build in mock => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4023177 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review