Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812561 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-04-22 12:08:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > This means you are shipping an unreleased version and therefore need the proper > > pre-release naming convention: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages > > I'm not sure I know what you mean here. Should I change the Release to be: > > Release: 0.2.dev.%{checkout}%{?dist} A "Release: $number" refers to a proper released version of the package and "Release: 0.$number" means, it is a pre-release version. So it looks from the package version, that you packaged 0.7, which is not released yet and therefore needs an "0." in the Release macro. > Having dev and the checkout info seems redundant to me, but after rereading the > naming guidelines I guess that's the most correct way to do it. /me too. I'd left "dev" out of the release: Release: 0.2.${date}git%{?dist} or Release: 0.2.${date}git${commitid}%{?dist} > > > > > > Why aren't you using the released 0.6.2? > > It seems run{,call,eval} and the python3 support are new since then. > > > > I wanted to use the most recent version available, 0.6.1 was released in > 10/2011 (I assume you mean 0.6.1, as there is no 0.6.2). Yes, sure... > > > > It would be great to ask upstream, what license exactly is meant with GPL as > > "GPL" seems to be bad: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#GPL_and_LGPL > > > > As upstream doesn't add a LICENSE/COPYING file, it's a SHOULD anyway to ask > > them to add one... > > I'll see if upstream will add this and clarify the license. Great. Most likely they mean GPLv2+ with it, but maybe only GPLv2... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review