[Bug 782560] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-shadow - *nix Shadow Password Module

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782560

--- Comment #29 from Todd Zullinger <tmz@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-04-19 10:16:32 EDT ---
I spent time over the past few days adding support for gem_extdir on Fedora >=
17.  An update spec file is now in place:

    http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/specs/rubygem-ruby-shadow.spec

As far as adding a comment about the licensing, would it suffice to link to the
original ruby-shadow review?  This code has not changed since then as far as
the licensing, so I don't think there's any reason to try and chase down the
original authors for a statement.

With respect to Fedora 15/16 support, I thought that they were supposed to have
backported support in ruby/irb/rubygems so that installing to the gemdir would
allow the module to be used from ruby?  This does not work for me:

[root@f16-32 /]# cat /etc/redhat-release 
Fedora release 16 (Verne)
[root@f16-32 /]# rpm -qa ruby\*
rubygems-1.8.11-1.fc16.1.noarch
ruby-libs-1.8.7.358-1.fc16.i686
ruby-irb-1.8.7.358-1.fc16.noarch
rubygem-ruby-shadow-2.1.3-2.fc16.i686
ruby-1.8.7.358-1.fc16.i686
ruby-rdoc-1.8.7.358-1.fc16.noarch
[root@f16-32 /]# irb
irb(main):001:0> require 'shadow'
LoadError: no such file to load -- shadow
        from (irb):1:in `require'
        from (irb):1
        from :0

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]