[Bug 738556] Review Request: gogoc - IPv6 TSP client for gogo6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738556

Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx
             Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)      |
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #33 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-04-16 10:50:54 EDT ---
A few items of note:

* This package is missing "BuildRequires: systemd-units", which it needs to
evaluate %{_unitdir}. Please be sure to fix this before commit, because
otherwise, this package will fail to build successfully.

* Also, since this code runs as root, you need to enable hardened build
support:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#PIE

I did a quick test of adding "%define _hardened_build 1" to the top of the spec
file and it looks to have been applied successfully at build time.

* This code is missing a copy of the GPLv2 license text. Not a packaging
blocker, but you should be sure to inform upstream and ask them to add a copy
of that license text in the source tree.

* The package contains two copies of an identical file:

/etc/gogoc/template/linux.sh
/usr/share/gogoc/template/linux.sh

The one in /usr/share is set chmod +x, but the one in /etc/gogoc/template/ is
not. Do you really need two copies? 

== Review ==

Good:

- rpmlint checks return:
gogoc.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
gogoc.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /etc/gogoc/template/linux.sh 0644L
/bin/sh
gogoc.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/gogoc/gogoc.conf 0640L
gogoc.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/gogoc
gogoc-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gogoc-1_2-RELEASE/gogoc-tsp/include/net_tcp6.h
gogoc-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/gogoc-1_2-RELEASE/gogoc-tsp/src/net/net_tcp6.c
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 2 warnings.

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (BSD and GPLv2) OK, text in %doc (for BSD), matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
(a0ef45c0bd1fc9964dc8ac059b7d78c12674bf67ef641740554e166fa99a2f49)
- package compiles on f17 (x86_64)
X missing BR: systemd-units
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file 

***** 

Show me a fixed SRPM with those issues (aside from the GPLv2 license text)
resolved and I will finish off this review and sponsor you.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]