[Bug 772406] Review Request: cpulimit - CPU Usage Limiter for Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772406

--- Comment #11 from Thomas Spura <tomspur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-04-07 14:43:43 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
>   thanks for your comments. I've contacted the vendor via direct mail couple of
> days ago and wait his reply. I'm not sure if packing the SVN version is good
> idea. From the use so far i did with 1.1 version on SL5 i didn't see any
> sigsegv (yet).

Sometimes it's needed, but as you are seemingly using it quite a lot, using 1.1
might be fine too... Lets wait a bit for an answer, till we simply move
along...

>   A question regarding grouping, i don't see this as development tool, i
> actually use it on the administrating side thus the current group, do insist on
> changing it? Is there any guide on what fits where that i should check?

I know no guide so far. Just pick a reasonable one from
/usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS.
Hmm, and you are using it there to limit the cpuusage of vi? Or why the
"/Text".
e.g. "Applications/System" makes more sense for me, when you think Devel/Tools
is wrong...

More other examples at:
$ repoquery --qf '%{group} %{name}' -a | sort | grep "Applications/System"

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]