Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676879 --- Comment #19 from Christos Triantafyllidis <christos.triantafyllidis@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-03-25 18:37:55 EDT --- Hi Jussi, thanks for your comments. Well i'm not that interested on the fedora branches as i am in EPEL ones. I totally understand your point but i can definitely say that there many (grid) sites that are running torque thus there would be some use for them. And fedora still ships this "obsolete" torque. Regarding whether this package is obsolete, well as long as torque and MPICH are maintained, and used in production i wouldn't say that this is the case. Now regarding naming i really don't care, functionality matters on my side, if you think that renaming it to "something"-mpiexec or mpiexec-"something" will help, i'm with you. I just used mpiexec as this is the name that vendor used. But for sure naming it "something"-mpiexec will not be the first guess that someone will try if he/she wants to install this package as vendor uses plain "mpiexec" (wrongly in my opinion too). Anyway i see that there is no will to push this forward, although there is no policy (that at least i'm aware of) against it, so feel free to close this ticket. Regards, Christos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review