Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676879 Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx --- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2012-03-25 13:40:28 EDT --- Hmm, this seems a rather nontrivial review, at least properly done. As noted above by Doug in comment #11, the applicability of the package is rather limited. I find it hard to imagine that anyone would run a cluster with current Fedora (or RHEL) and use an antique queueing system that doesn't have out-of-the-box support for MPI, as there are other queue managers (and MPI libraries) which handle this without problems. This being said, if there is enough interest, the package can of course be included in Fedora. But for a good review to take place, the reviewer should also test if the program works (which, admittedly, doesn't always happen). Although I'm a heavy user of clusters and queue systems (and have had a hand in writing the Fedora MPI guidelines), I lack the knowledge to properly review this package. IMHO, this package is a curiosity, and can be said to be obsolete. If you (or someone else) ends up packaging this in Fedora, the name needs to be changed, 'mpiexec' is just too general. To reflect the use case of the package, something like pbs-mpiexec or torque-mpiexec (or -mpich) would be far more suitable and less prone to cause problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review