Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760594 --- Comment #3 from Denis Arnaud <denis.arnaud_fedora@xxxxxxx> 2012-03-02 02:56:46 EST --- Thanks for the review, Matthias! Of course, the spec file name will change to be simcrs.spec (in the Fedora Git repository). In fact, I use a symbolic link (from simcrs.spec to simcrs-0.1.1-1.spec) and it is enough for rpmlint to be happy when hacking with rpmbuild. I generally prefer stating explicitly the version number in the spec file name when located on my FedoraPeople's account, as it is easier to spot the right file to use. [In the future, I will use my GitHub account, and therefore use Git to version the spec file] Then, you are of course right, the source tar-ball mismatch is not good. I have forgotten to update the tar-ball on FedoraPeople with a latest update. Sorry. I will deliver a new version this week-end. Thanks again Denis -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review