[Bug 790628] Review Request: Adobe Source Libraries - General Purpose Addon for Boost and STL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790628

David Timms <dtimms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dtimms@xxxxxxxxxxxx

--- Comment #12 from David Timms <dtimms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-02-18 22:13:52 EST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17870887/adobe-3/adobe-source-libraries.spec
Just some basic questions/comments:

1. The source download pointed to by the web page is a sf download. You would
usually use a full URL for the Source0. Fedora uses a specific fixed URL to
access sf sources, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Sourceforge.net

Unless you are packaging direct from version control, and if so, should state
why, and the Release: would need work to fit with one of Fedora's pre/post
release naming schemes, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_packages

2. Where possible, provide comment info on Source1,2. eg: exact URL retrieved
from (in that case, why not use the url directly ?), or where it came from ?

3. In your changelog, please use a blank line to separate each dated entry.

4. Don't use large amount of white space between changelog date, email, and
version parts.

5. Changelog version: don't include {?dist} ie: .fc15, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs "must item"

6. Don't have you editor write config items to the spec file. (expandtab etc).

7. Static libs: see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries

This looked promising regarding bjam and shared libraries:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1768943/building-boost-on-linux-library-names

Might be worth looking to see if another rpm based distro solved this already,
eg Mandriva, Suse etc., or hints from debian based distro.

8. tools/bjam: is this tool already in fedora ? If so, then BuildRequire it
instead.

These items are more technical; I haven't tried to build or analyse the prep /
build commands. ps. I'm not a sponsor.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]