[Bug 772284] Review Request: libnl3 - convenience library for kernel netlink API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772284

--- Comment #5 from Dan Williams <dcbw@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-01-12 16:18:38 EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I updated spec and libnl version as well. The main difference is to put libnl3
> files into /usr/ and to include -cli as separate package:
> 
> Spec diff URL: http://people.redhat.com/jpirko/libnl3/libnl3.spec.diff
> Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jpirko/libnl3/libnl3.spec
> SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jpirko/libnl3/libnl3-3.2.5-1.fc16.src.rpm
> 
> Successfully built in koji
> (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3642248)
> 
> I successfully built and run my libteam library against this.

We've put the libs into /lib to make sure we can still boot the system when
/usr is network mounted; NetworkManager for example requires libnl and if it
were in /usr we wouldn't be able to boot a network-mounted-/usr system.

I wasn't quite sure what to do about the cli tools so thanks for handling that.
 Can we keep the libraries in /lib or /lib64 for now to match the packaging of
libnl 1.x?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]