Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755093 --- Comment #29 from Mads Kiilerich <mads@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-12-13 17:22:52 EST --- (In reply to comment #27) > http://www.codon.org.uk/~mjg59/mactel-boot/mactel-boot-0.1-3.fc16.src.rpm For My Information: The content of mactel-boot-0.1.tar.bz2 changed without changing the version number. hfs-bless now takes the directory of 3rd argument as 2nd argument and the mount point of both as 1st argument. hfs-bless will now in the process umount the mount point specified as 1st argument, and before exit it will call system("mount /boot/efi"). For what it's worth: I find the command line interface even more strange and error-prone than before. The idea of a rpm trigger scripts that invokes a binary which mounts and unmounts file systems and might render the system unbootable if it fails, that do not seem very appealing to me. My previous tests and the right interpretation of them indicates that the problem has been that the directory inode wasn't written correctly. The incorrect inode was written "correctly" and I have not seen anything that indicates that it was a problem that the filesystem was mounted. However, I guess argv[1] should be used instead of hardcoding /boot/efi. I will test RSN. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review