Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758166 --- Comment #5 from Nelson Marques <nmo.marques@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-12-05 10:28:42 EST --- Tom, The most important thing is to serve well and not enter in potential maintenance nightmares. So here's a question: - Can we work with two different branches? One for Fedora with the latest stable release (0.7.0) and one for RHEL with 0.6.1 which has less glitches. Still on the Fedora realm... here's a few things: - C# shouldn't be an issue. Your packaging is supreme. - haskell, sure. - Ruby - I'm not sure if we should provide the gem, as many people seem to prefer to have the gem built in separate, I've seen this a few times (no clue why). - Java should be ok, at least while RHEL doesn't provide the basic dependency versioning for ant, Fedora does. Now regarding perl(Math:BigInt), I followed what the upstream documentation suggested. I will introduce this change as well. About %check section, yes, I've removed it. I'm going to toy a bit more with this and submit hopefully still today a new spec. PS: As redundant information, the section I removed with the defines was mainly used by "Tirpitz", a small script I'm working to take a generic spec and provide a specific spec according to SUSE/Fedora/RHEL packaging guidelines. It's still a lot to do, and it's a part of my python learning process. We can live without it :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review