Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755093 --- Comment #17 from Mads Kiilerich <mads@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-11-24 09:39:37 EST --- Resetting PRAM and NVRAM makes no difference - except that I now have [root@fladmast ~]# efibootmgr -v BootCurrent: 0000 Timeout: 5 seconds BootOrder: 0080 Boot0080* Mac OS X ACPI(a0341d0,0)PCI(1f,2)03120a00000000000000HD(6,17716800,5000,aa0b2ede-b4b7-4105-aafa-09b6daeb8fa6) BootFFFF* ACPI(a0341d0,0)PCI(1f,2)03120a00000000000000HD(1,28,64000,34b7e09a-8a76-42fd-8cad-6a2aaa332fff)File(\System\Library\CoreServices\boot.efi) But still, OS/X blessing through a symlink makes 'bless --info' report the target file but the firmware will skip it and boot something else (the unblessed boot.efi on ESP). Another possible difference could be that I am using a file system created by hfs-mkfs which thus doesn't have any UUID. That could perhaps prevent the firmware from making an exact match on the blessed efi and make it fall back to some other mode. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review