Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-01-26 11:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #26) > I think that PAM is not really obligatory as requires, What I mention is this requires pam ">= 0.80-9", not only pam, because "include config-util" sentence cannot be interpretted under pam 0.80-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review