Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seedit: SELinux Policy Editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222594 ------- Additional Comments From lxtnow@xxxxxxxxx 2007-01-26 11:19 EST ------- > > This sentence requires pam >= 0.80 so I think > > adding "Requires: pam >= 0.80" is preferable. > Yes, in old pam, it does not work. > Fixed. >For this, I think "pam >= 0.80-9" is preferable as said >in comment 23, because config-util is introduced on 0.80-9. I think that PAM is not really obligatory as requires, considering it is the default authentication of fedora system, it's already installed from first installation of fedora Core. On the other hand, it would surely be necessary to add "usermode" in fields requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review