Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693608 --- Comment #20 from Dirk Götz <dirk.goetz@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-11-08 07:45:31 EST --- I do not see the problem with the user decision. If the user has to decide between icinga-idoutils-mysql and icinga-idoutils-pgsql (or installing both if he for some unknown reasons likes) and this package installs the idoutils with libdbi-support and the corresponding libdbi-driver, the user has the possiblity to decide and does not need to know which further packages to install. Also the user benefit is less (unnecessary) files on the system. If the user has one generic icinga-idoutils with all files, he installs the package and also needs to know that he has to install the needed libdbi-driver and to decide which one he actually needs. I think the first one is more user-friendly. I just asked the question if compiling with support for both is possible, because I do not know how to handle multiple make && make install with different parameters for one source in one rpmbuild. If it is possible, I am just not experienced enough to know how! If not, we perhaps need to make one decision for the packages on a technical limitation or need multiple specfiles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review