Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693608 --- Comment #19 from Michael Friedrich <michael.friedrich@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-11-08 06:33:22 EST --- actually the point in naming it genericly "icinga-idoutils" is to use the libdbi version, and allow the user to decide * which driver is being used * which driver is loaded one could install all possible libdbd-* drivers, and just select that by changing ido2db.cfg entry. i would not recommend to make the driver for libdbi an actual dependency of icinga idoutils. it should be made a user decision only. regarding the libdbi and libpq compiles - it wouldn't make sense to add that doubled dependency to a package. either use libdbi (which is stable implemented) or use libpq (which is not yet implemented, experimental). so i do think it's fine to support binary builds for each rdbms layer. if the would be oracle available, one could also build idoutils with ocilib dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review