Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749132 --- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx> 2011-11-02 15:48:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > > The main one for now is dpm-dsi-libs or not since then I can actually > > install to check. > > I added a dependency on the base package, following this: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package > > but this means also the rest (daemon scripts, sysconfig, etc) will get > installed. It's ok, but would be better to break it into -libs and depend on > that one instead? Breaking out a libs pkg can makes sense, it means you will get the 32bit libs in the 64 bit repos. However is anyone ever going to want the libraries and not the service and start up scripts. People are unlikely to link to this library I would have thought? Up to you. Is gssapi_openssl.h not just an old version of $ rpm -qf /usr/include/globus/gssapi.h globus-gssapi-gsi-devel-7.8-1.fc15.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review