Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749055 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-11-02 15:45:15 EDT --- I'm not sure I agree with any license that's not marked GPLv2+ here. Sure, there are some sources that are LGPLv2+, GPLv2+, but the aggregate license of those combined sources for both the library and activitymanager pieces ends up being GPLv2+ The ontologies are fun too, only used during the build process (via onto2vocabularyclass too) to generate some sources/headers, but each of those generated files are clearly marked LGPLv2+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review