Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474549 --- Comment #50 from Iang <iang@xxxxxxxx> 2011-11-02 05:25:12 EDT --- A couple of additional caveats: 1. Startcom is a different kettle of fish. It doesn't have an RPA (last I looked) and doesn't follow the normal CA contractual pattern. Because it doesn't have a defined agreement and instead relies on its CPS, it is much harder to interpret in legal terms. It is better to familiarise with the Verisign standard RPA approach first, and then branch out. 2. Please also note that it is your responsibility to agree to the RPAs and understand them, as and when you use certificates. As professionals, we are limited in what we can say about brother CAs. Obviously, this absence of inspection can be be used against you, and has been used against you in this case, because you believed you could rely under your own definitions. That is indeed why we are the blatant ones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review