[Bug 746824] Review Request: dnssec-check - A tool to check DNSSEC capabilities of the local DNS resolvers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746824

Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #4 from Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-11-01 16:30:39 EDT ---
for upstream:

mainwindow.cpp: In member function 'void MainWindow::getAnswers()':
mainwindow.cpp:247:57: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to
'char*'

rpmlint:

[paul@bofh paul]$ rpmlint /home/paul/SRPMS/dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc14.src.rpm
/home/paul/RPMS/x86_64/dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm/home/paul/RPMS/x86_64/dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm
/home/paul/RPMS/x86_64/dnssec-check-debuginfo-1.11.p2-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm
dnssec-check.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mechansim ->
mechanism
(none): E: no installed packages by name
/home/paul/RPMS/x86_64/dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm/home/paul/RPMS/x86_64/dnssec-check-1.11.p2-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.


MUST items:

* OK: Complies to package nameing guidlines
* OK: matches base package
* OK: Meets package guidelines
* OK: Valid license BSD matches source code
* OK: Written in Americanized engish as required 
* OK: COPYING packaged in %doc
* OK: spec file legible
* OK: source matches upstream source
* OK: package compiles and builds on main architecture
* OK: buildrequires good, rebuilds in mock 
* OK: no bad locale handling
* OK: no libraries, no ldconfig calls in post/postun
* OK: not relocatable
* OK: does not create or need to own directories
* OK: no duplicate files listed
* OK: Does not bundle other libraries
* OK: macro use consistent
* OK: package contains code or permissable content
* OK: no large document files
* OK: no header files in base package
* OK: no static libraries
* OK: no .so files in base package
* OK: no devel package dependancy issues
* OK: package does not contain .la/.a files
* OK: gui dnssec-check.desktop properly installed with desktop-file-install
* OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
  packages. 
* OK: filenames are valid UTF-8

SHOULD items:

* No translation of description/summary in other languages available
* Reviewer tested build in mock and found no missing BuildRequires
* no scriplets present
* no subpackages present
* no pkgconfig present
* no outside file dependancies
* WARN: missing man page for dnssec-nodes  Encourage upstream to write one :)

PASS

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]