Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 --- Comment #119 from Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-25 05:13:55 EDT --- > I could write up man pages for those executables, but they'd be completely > unused because those executables are not meant to be used except as tools by > other executables which do already have man pages. I understand that. And this is not MUST, but only SHOULD item. But still having *some* man page is nice thing. Even if it would be very short man page with something like: "You should not run XXXX manually. This is called internally by YYYY(8). See also YYYY(8)" ad tiffcp - fair enough ad chroot-ed environment - fair enough, I have no objection to content. But I do have objection to directory where it reside. Why you use /var/spool/hylafax? Quoting: http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#PURPOSE47 "/var/spool contains data which is awaiting some kind of later processing. Data in /var/spool represents work to be done in the future (by a program, user, or administrator); often data is deleted after it has been processed." I would really recommend you to move it to /var/hylafax/chroot (similary as e.g. bind-chroot does). Is is viable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review